Reweaving Clinical Compassion: Integrating Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine in Contemporary Healthcare Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71204/zvvy4j32Keywords:
Medical Humanities, Narrative Medicine, Empathy Training, Medical Education Reform, Patient-Centered CareAbstract
The accelerating pace of medical technology and standardized clinical procedures has altered the traditional physician–patient dynamic, leading to a growing divide between scientific rationality and humanistic concern in modern health care. In response to this imbalance, the integration of medical humanities and narrative medicine has emerged as a promising pathway to restore empathy, enhance communication, and strengthen professional identity among medical practitioners. This paper reviews the historical foundations and conceptual evolution of medical humanities, and analyzes the global trajectory of narrative medicine as a pedagogical and clinical approach. Drawing on recent educational reform trends, the study identifies the structural challenges that hinder the implementation of humanistic curricula in medical training, including fragmented course design, limited interdisciplinary collaboration, and insufficient assessment frameworks. It then proposes strategies for integrating narrative-based reflective learning, cross-disciplinary curricular models, and competency-oriented evaluation systems into medical education. The paper argues that the deep integration of medical humanities and narrative medicine is crucial for cultivating physicians who are not only clinically competent but also capable of ethical reasoning, emotional resonance, and patient-centered care. Ultimately, such integration represents a pathway toward transforming health care into a practice marked by both precision and compassion.
References
Charon, R. (2001). Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, professionalism, and trust. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(15), 1897–1902.
DasGupta, S., & Charon, R. (2004). Personal illness narratives: Using reflective writing to teach empathy. Academic Medicine, 79(4), 351–356.
Dean, W., Talbot, S., & Dean, A. (2019). Reframing clinician distress: Moral injury, not burnout. Federal Practitioner, 36(9), 400–402.
Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136.
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1963)
Greenhalgh, T., & Hurwitz, B. (Eds.). (1999). Narrative based medicine: Dialogue and discourse in clinical practice. BMJ Books.
Jonsen, A. R. (2000). A short history of medical ethics. Oxford University Press.
Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition. Basic Books.
Montgomery, K. (2006). How doctors think: Clinical judgment and the practice of medicine. Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, J., Coulehan, J., Wear, D., & Montello, M. (2009). Medical humanities and their discontents: Definitions, critiques, and implications. Academic Medicine, 84(2), 192–198.
Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. Basic Books.
Zhu, X. X., Du, L. L., et al. (2025). From Tradition to Modernity: The Integrated Development of Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine. Chinese Medical Ethics, 11, 1–6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lin Li (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited. Authors retain copyright of their work, and readers are free to copy, share, adapt, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as appropriate attribution is given.
